One of NJ Transit's roomy double-decker trains pulling into the Clifton station last Monday. Clifton is one of the few stations with a free parking lot for commuters. |
Upper deck or lower? Avoid the train's poorly designed upper deck, with its low, head-cracking metal luggage rack. The lower deck, shown here, is a far better bet. |
By VICTOR E. SASSON
EDITOR
The Record's breathless front-page account today of another Hackensack University Medical Center expansion examines the deal from every angle except the one that means the most to residents of its host city.
"The new organization ... will employ 23,400 people and have more than $3.4 billion in revenues ...," the story reports in the second paragraph (A-1).
The medical center's building boom in Hackensack fundamentally changed the residential character of the neighborhood, and the city has little to show in terms of property tax revenue.
HUMC is non-profit, and hasn't returned anything in lieu of the tens of millions of dollars in taxes denied to the city.
Businesses and homeowners pay more as a result.
Yet, The Record's coverage of HUMC resembles boosterism, perhaps a legacy of the years North Jersey Media Group Vice President/General Counsel Jennifer A. Borg spent on the medical center board.
Localizing Ebola
The local assignment editors sent Staff Writer Christopher Maag to Newark Liberty International Airport on Thursday, the first day of "targeted health screenings for the Ebola virus" (A-6).
But someone, likely as editor, screwed up Maag's lead paragraph:
"The first day of targeted health screenings ... was quiet Thursday ...."
Instead, this is how it should have read:
"Thursday, the first day of targeted health screenings ..., was quiet ...."
Why send Maag and not a medical writer?
The reporter covers NJ Transit and other transportation issues, and the airport presumably is part of his beat, according to the assignment editors' tortured reasoning.
Back to the story. Let's hope Nana Smith of Hackensack doesn't suffer any fallout from being photographed at the airport "waiting for a friend from Ghana" (A-6).
More Garrett lies
Diane Callaghan of River Vale, a letter writer, says a TV ad promoting another term for Rep. Scott Garrett, R-Wantage, claims the six-termer hits the ground running every morning "to create better economic opportunities for women and their families" (A-18).
Callaghan notes Garrett voted against the Violence Against Women Act, which would have passed tougher sentences for those who commit crimes against women, as well as the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, which strengthened laws against wage discrimination.
Add women to Superstorm Sandy aid, both of which the Garrett campaign claims the conservative Tea Party icon favored, contrary to the truth.
Garrett will say anything to win another term in the 5th Congressional District -- getting elected is his main concern.
Roy Cho advances
Meanwhile, Democratic challenger Roy Cho of Hackenack says two recent polls show he has "vaulted into a very competitive position within single digits" of Garrett.
Compared to Garrett, who is against anything that will help the middle class, Cho has a lot going for him, including his making his first bid for elective office.
Redistricting of the 5th District in 2011 added several heavily Democratic communities, including Hackensack.
Seventy percent of the voters in the district live in Bergen County.
The boomerang-shaped district stretches from the Delaware to the Hudson rivers.
Stomach turning
Flies not only stand on poop, they eat it, so word that Staff Writer Elisa Ung "repeatedly waved away flies in the dining room" of S. Egidio in Ridgewood is an instant turnoff (BL-16).
Only an overweight restaurant reviewer who tops off full meals with a Nutella-stuffed calzone and cheesecake could love this Neapolitan pizzeria, on which she bestows 2.5 stars.
Restaurant names continue to puzzle me.
This joint is named after saint I never heard of. What about the Indian restaurant called Dhoom?
Very funny comment regarding flies and poop as related to restaurant review. Could be the food editor's only exercise is swatting flies.
ReplyDeleteWell, you'd have to add cutting humongous pieces of beef, lifting the food to her mouth and chewing,
DeleteWhich reviewer are you talking about? Elisa isn't fat. Maybe Pat Mack was but Elisa isn't.
ReplyDeleteShe was overweight when she came to the paper, as was evident every time she walked past my desk. Now, after all the dessert she eats and having a kid or kids, I doubt she has lost weight.
DeletePerhaps you have her confused with someone else? She does not appear overweight by any rational standard.
ReplyDeleteThat dated photo the paper uses with her reviews -- her face looks fat there.
DeleteYou worked outside the men's room. Are you saying she was a man?
ReplyDeletePlease don't remind me of the disgusting bathroom habits of you and other staffers I was forced to hear and witness.
DeleteAre you one of those who made frequent visits with a newspaper?